Tuesday, 23 August 2016

Gender issues in Sports

Gender is a social construct that defines the roles, behaviour and activities of men and women. Social perception plays an important role in deciding the behaviour of social beings in various situations and in various activities. Sport is not an exception. The participation in sport is also determined by the social norms. Sport is a field where the demonstration of strength, aggression and power is a must. According to the social norms, these are the characteristics of male and therefore the participation of male in sporting activities is considered to be ‘natural’. On the contrary, the female participation in sports is not encouraged due to the social definition of ‘femininity’. The physical and psychological attributes, which are essential to attain success in sports, may conflict with the society’s sanctioned definition of ‘femininity’. Thus, if a woman tries to achieve excellence in sports, she may risk an exclusion from the social definition of being ‘normal’. This perception of the society discourages women from participating in sports.

The ‘gender- divide’ in sport directs the sporting organizations to allocate majority of the resources for the development of male sports. The gender division in sports can be observed in the Olympic Games, where the participation of women was not encouraged for a long time.

In the ancient Olympic Games, Hera Games was the only event in which married women could participate. There was no such event available for the unmarried girls. This trend was followed during the initial years of the modern Olympic Games. The dominance of male athletes in the Olympic Games during this period acted as a deterrent to equity of access and opportunity.

Hergeaves divided the women’s participation in the modern Olympic Games in three different phases. The first phase was between 1896 and 1928, which was the period of exclusion of women from sports. The second phase was between 1928 and 1952 when the socially acceptable events were included for the participation of women. The last phase was between 1952 till present when the women athletes constantly challenge the ‘masculine hegemony’ of the games.

The entry of the Soviet Block into the Olympic Games, with their political medal agenda, triggered the female participation in the games. It was irrelevant to the governments of the Soviet Block whether their medals were won by the male athletes or female athletes.

Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympic Games, opposed the participation of women athletes in the games and thus in the initial years the games were exclusive to the male athletes. However, the exclusivity did not survive long.

According to Philips, the women athletes during the initial period of the modern Olympic Games tried to achieve two different objectives. First, was to avoid exclusion and second, was to ensure meaningful presence. In 1924, de Coubertin suggested that the female athletes should not be allowed in the Olympic Games. However, the IOC did not accept this proposal. In 1925, at the Olympic Congress, which was held in Prague, he again claimed that the participation of women in the Olympic Games was illegal.

From the above discussion, it is clear that the female athletes, in the early days of the modern Olympic Games faced resistance from a part of the officials of the IOC, which was due to the negative perception of the society on the participation of women in sporting activities. The result was lack of organizational support. Women faced similar resistance in their attempt to take part in sports administration.

The ‘Stats Pack for Media’ report, which was last updated in June 2015, indicates the lack of media coverage for women’s sports in the UK by stating the following:

i)                    Only 7% of all sports media in the UK is dedicated to women’s sports
ii)                  Just over 10% of televised sports coverage in the UK is dedicated to women’s sports
iii)                Only 2% of national newspapers sports coverage is given to the women’s sports
iv)                Radio coverage for women’s sports is only 5%
v)                  Only 4% of online sports coverage is given to the women’s sports

The above figures represent that the women’s sport is still not as valuable as men’s sports both in terms of commercial dealing and media coverage.


It is perceived that the women athletes are inferior in terms of their athletic abilities and are less intense than men in sports. This leads to lack of commercialization and lack of resource allocation for the development of women’s sports.